On March 14, a category motion lawsuit was filed towards the just lately shut down crypto-friendly, New York-based Signature Financial institution, and its former chief govt workplace, Joseph DePaolo, chief monetary officer, Stephen Wyremski, and chief working officer, Eric Howell, for allegedly committing fraud Reuters reported

Shareholders have accused the financial institution of falsely claiming to be “financially robust” simply three days earlier than it was seized by the state regulator. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for shareholders who held inventory between March 2 and 12, 2023.


The lawsuit was filed in federal courtroom in Brooklyn by shareholders led by Matthew Schaeffer. The plaintiffs declare that Signature Bank hid its susceptibility to a takeover by making false or deceptive statements about its well being. The aim of those statements was allegedly to curb fears sparked by the troubles confronted by Silicon Valley Bank, which was seized by the Federal Deposit Insurance coverage Corp two days earlier than Signature Financial institution.

In accordance with the lawsuit, Signature Financial institution made statements claiming that it may meet “all consumer wants,” and had sufficient capital and liquidity to differentiate itself from rivals throughout “difficult occasions,” and was financially robust. These statements allegedly hid the financial institution’s true monetary state. The lawsuit was reportedly filed by the identical legislation agency that sued Silicon Valley Financial institution’s mum or dad firm, SVB Monetary Group, and its CEO and CFO on Monday.

To spice up public belief within the banking sector and shield the financial system, regulators in the USA decided on Sunday to offer full compensation to depositors of Signature Financial institution and Silicon Valley Financial institution, whatever the steadiness of their accounts. Nonetheless, the identical protections is not going to be prolonged to shareholders.

Related: Marathon Digital: Deposits held at Signature Bank are secure and available

On March 12, the New York Division of Monetary Providers (NYDFS) formally shut down and took over the New York-based Signature Bank.  The choice to shut the financial institution was made in collaboration with the Federal Reserve to safeguard the U.S. financial system and enhance public confidence within the banking system, based on a press release launched by the Federal Reserve on March 12.

On March 13, Former U.S. Consultant Barney Frank who additionally occurs to be a board member of the financial institution, urged that the current closure of Signature Financial institution was executed as a part of a seeming present of pressure. Frank stated that the one signal of points at Signature was a $10 billion deposit run on March 10, which he attributed to contagion from the Silicon Valley Financial institution fallout. 

Frank shared that he believes regulators needed to ship a powerful anti-crypto message, despite the fact that there was no insolvency based on the fundamentals. He shared in an interview with CNBC: 

“I believe a part of what occurred was that regulators needed to ship a really robust anti-crypto message. […] We turned the poster boy as a result of there was no insolvency primarily based on the basics.”