Legal professionals for NBA star Shaquille O’Neal, who beforehand endorsed the now-bankrupt crypto trade FTX, have claimed two course of servers inadequately delivered authorized paperwork after earlier failed makes an attempt.

In a Could 8 submitting for the US District Court docket within the Southern District of Florida, O’Neal’s authorized group mentioned following “a failed movement to serve” the NBA star, two course of servers “tossed” papers for a authorized criticism in entrance of his shifting automobile. In line with the submitting, O’Neal didn’t cease to select up the papers however left them within the street.


“This purported ‘service’ is insufficient beneath Rule 4 of the Federal Guidelines of Civil Process and Georgia regulation,” mentioned the submitting. “It must be quashed, and the claims in opposition to Mr. O’Neal dismissed.”

O’Neal was one in every of many high-profile figures who endorsed FTX earlier than its chapter submitting in November 2022. The NBA star appeared in a industrial saying he was “all in” for the crypto trade. Following the trade’s collapse and dealing with potential authorized motion, O’Neal reportedly said he was “only a paid spokesperson” for the agency.

In November, the Moskowitz regulation agency filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of Edwin Garrison and different FTX traders in opposition to celebrities and sports activities figures for selling the trade. An identical lawsuit filed by the identical agency in March targeted crypto influencers, together with YouTuber Ben Armstrong, often known as BitBoy Crypto, who allegedly promoted FTX’s “crypto fraud with out disclosing compensation.”

Moskowitz reported on April 16 that O’Neal had been served with the authorized criticism outdoors his home following a number of unsuccessful makes an attempt. The regulation agency didn’t particularly point out delivering the paperwork to the NBA star in his automobile or in any other case throwing them.

“As Mr. O’Neal — who by no means exited his automobile — drove previous the strangers lurking outdoors his house, one of many course of servers ‘tossed the authorized paperwork on the entrance of’ his automobile,” mentioned the Could 8 submitting. “When the paperwork hit the automobile, which was shifting ‘at a excessive fee of velocity,’ the paperwork ‘f[e]ll onto the street,’ and the method servers ‘l[e]ft the authorized paperwork on the street the place they landed’ — that’s, on the general public street.”

Associated: Judge mulls removing Shaq and Naomi Osaka from FTX lawsuits

In line with the submitting, this alleged methodology of serving authorized paperwork was “inadequate beneath Georgia regulation” and insufficient:

“Throwing papers at a shifting automobile and leaving them unattended on a public freeway ‘shouldn’t be good tender because it supplies no means of understanding whether or not the papers landed in bodily proximity to’ Mr. O’Neal.”

Moskowitz has obtained authorization from the court docket to serve other individuals related to the lawsuit, together with by tweet within the case of crypto YouTuber Tom Nash.

Journal: Can you trust crypto exchanges after the collapse of FTX?